PRESENSEA Project Logo PRESENSEA

Feeling the Pressure? A Deep Dive into Low-Cost Underwater Sensors

by Elizaveta Dubrovinskaya

Make vs. Buy: Cost-Effective Underwater Pressure Sensors for DIY & Research Projects

When you need to measure pressure underwater, the first question is always: Do you build it yourself, or buy a ready-made solution? Sure, companies like Blue Robotics, Keller, or Impact Sea sell pre-sealed, high-reliability sensors. But if your project operates under tight budget constraints—or prioritizes hands-on prototyping for research and development—buying off-the-shelf solutions might leave you high and dry. Let’s explore your options and dive into practical alternatives!

Some MEMS shops like Mouser or DigiKey offer a comprehensive characteristic filter for choosing between thousands of different sensors. Let’s chart a course through the options and avoid drowning in complexity.

How to Choose Underwater Pressure Sensors: Key Questions for Accurate Data Collection

The choice is obviously defined by specific application, in research it can be very different. But at this point let’s ask the right questions.

  • What is the data? Hydrostatic that is dependent on the depth. Hydrodynamic – small fluctuations of the pressure
  • What are the environment requirements? Freshwater or saltwater? Will it face mechanical vibrations, EMI/RFI interference, or the wrath of Neptune himself?
  • What are the design requirements? how the sensor will be sealed? Will you use digital or analog signals? What connector works best?

What data do you want to measure?

While there is a lot of different applications for underwater pressure sensors, there are always two components. Hydrostatic that is dependent on the depth. Hydrodynamic – small fluctuations of the pressure that may come from moving pressure media (or vessel itself). Acoustic pressure is a whole another source which we will not consider in this post.

When it comes to how we measure, we can measure absolute pressure (relative to perfect vacuum), gauge (relative to some value e.g. ambient atmospheric pressure) and differential (difference between pressure in two points). For underwater environment, make sure that gauge sensors have properly sealed gauge port.

Most physical sensors are prone to temperature errors so manufacturers add temperature measurement and compensation [1]. Think of integration of additional sensors (e.g. conductivity or full AHRS) if needed.

How accurate and frequent we want the data to be?

Sensor Types Compared: Piezoresistive, Capacitive, and Fiber-Optic for Underwater Use

This should define the physical principle behind the sensor. Here is a table with some basic information.

Type of sensor Principle Pro Contras
Piezoresistive [1, 2] Electrical resistance of material is changed when exposed to pressure. Mature, Low cost, widely used, high sensitivity (sub-Pascal resolution) Sensitive to temperature induced errors, in harsh medias prone to long term drift and hysteresis.
Capacitive [3, 4] Two parallel conductive plates, one of them is a flexible diaphragm that deforms under pressure and changes the capacitance Mature, no DC power, long-term and overpressure stability, Require complex low-noise interface and calibration algorithms, silicon components suffer from salt exposure
Stain Gauge Like piezoresistive technology, but the resistance element is spring-like that deforms under pressure More suitable for long-term monitoring  
Piezoelectric [6, 7] Ceramic or polymer material generates a charge under pressure Robust, no DC power, high sensitivity to fast small pressure pulses in MHz range Output charge leaks so can only measure dynamic (AC) pressure changes
Fiber-optic [8] Measures strain-induced wavelength shift No DC power, Immune to electromagnetic interference, potentially tens of kHz response, naturally corrosion proof Emerging \ Requires costly laser interrogators
Flexible polymer [9] Porous composites high sensitivity to constant pressure Emerging, slow (tens of Hz) due to viscoelasticity,

Environmental Challenges: Corrosion, Biofouling, and Pressure Protection for Sensors

While some sensors tout waterproofing straight out of the box, critical applications—deep-sea deployments or long-term monitoring—demand extra armor. Think of deploying a sensor like launching a ship: even for a short voyage, a sturdy hull (pressure housing, oil filling, or encapsulation) is non-negotiable to resist leaks and corrosion. For extended missions, the stakes rise: constant pressure, biofouling (algae and barnacles turning your sensor into prime real estate), and internal condensation threaten organic materials in seals and membranes. Over time, these stressors degrade components, risking leaks and data loss.

Even at shallow depths, airtight seals can buckle under temperature or pressure shifts. Incorporate pressure compensation elements (e.g., vent holes) to avoid catastrophic leaks.

Opt for stainless steel alloys (for moderate deployments) or titanium (for extreme longevity or clorine water) in housings. Pair with polymer compounds like PVDF or PTFE for o-rings or cable connections, or go all-stainless with welded seals to repel corrosion and biofouling.

Sealing Techniques: Protecting Underwater Sensors from Leaks and Condensation

When safeguarding underwater sensors, conformal coatings like brush-on or sprayed acrylic or silicone offer a lightweight, removable shield for short-term deployments—a flexible solution for prototyping or temporary setups. For more permanent installations, epoxy or parylene encapsulation acts as a "suit of armor," providing robust, long-term defense against moisture and corrosion. However, always verify material compatibility : Ensure seals and coatings withstand curing temperatures, solvents, or mechanical stress during assembly. For rapid prototyping, consider unconventional methods like sealing sensors in balloons—a low-cost, DIY approach highlighted in projects like MIT SeaPerch’s pressure-testing guide. Balancing protection, durability, and ease of implementation ensures your sensor survives both lab trials and real-world depths.

Analog vs. Digital Sensors: Signal Integrity for Underwater Pressure Monitoring

Analog signal (e.g. voltage or current loop) is continuous which may be crucial for some real-time applications. However analog voltage signal is prone to noise especially in long cables. It also may require extra analog-to-digital conversion and signal processing units. Digital sensors already include A2D conversion and often some basic signal processing units [11]. However the output is quantized which may be an issue when sensor is intended for high depth and exact low depth values are needed.

Top Low-Cost Underwater Sensors: Depth Range, Accuracy & Compatibility Guide

Sensor Protection type Depth range Output Size Price (EUR) Datasheet
Bosch Sensortec BMP384 Gel-filled Barometric (~2.5m) Digital (I2C/SPI) 2.0 x 2.0 x 1.0 mm 2-4 Link
STMicroelectronics LPS27HHTW WR package, potting gel, o-ring compatible Barometric (~2.6m) Digital (I2C/SPI/I3C) 2.5 x 2.5 x 1.1 mm 3-6 Link
STMicroelectronics ILPS28QSWTR WR package, potting gel, Qvar Up to 40m Digital (I2C, 24 bit) 2.8 x 2.8 x 1.95 mm 5-7 Link
TE Connectivity MS5837 Gel-filled, protective cap Up to 300m Digital (I2C, 24 bit) 3.3 x 3.3 x 2.75 mm 10-15 Link
TE Connectivity EPB-PW Titanium housing, sealed gauge High pressure Analog (mV/V) 6.4mm x 11.4mm ~200 Link
TE Connectivity AST4530 Stainless steel housing, sealed Up to 700m Analog (V, mA) ~25.4mm diameter 150-400 Link
Honeywell HSC/SSC (liquid) Liquid media option Up to 100m Analog, Digital ~10 x 10 mm 20-70 Link
Honeywell SPT series Stainless steel wetted part Up to 3450m Analog (mV, V, mA) ~22mm diameter 70-200 Link
Honeywell MIP series Stainless steel, Sealed (IP67) Up to 600m Analog, Digital (SENT) ~27mm hex body 80-250 Link
Honeywell PX2 series Stainless steel, Sealed (IP69K) Up to 700m Analog, Digital (CAN) ~25mm hex body 100-300 Link
NXP NBP 8/9X Chemical resistant gel Barometric (not for depth) Digital (SPI, PWM) 4 x 4 mm 10-25 Link
Adafruit LPS28DFW WR pkg (board needs sealing) Up to 40m Digital (I2C) 25.4 x 17.8 mm 12-15 Link
Adafruit LPS33HW WR pkg (board needs sealing) Up to 2.5m Digital (I2C/SPI) 25.4 x 17.8 mm 12-15 Link
Blue Robotics Bar30 Sealed unit, o-ring mount Up to 300m Digital (I2C) 20mm dia, 26mm len 80-100 Link

*Prices are valid as of 12.06.25

References

  1. Vardanyan, Y., & Pyo, S. (2024). Emerging MEMS sensors for ocean physics: Principles, materials, and applications. APL Machine Learning, 2(2), 020901.
  2. Barlian, A. A., et al. (2007). Review: Semiconductor Piezoresistance for Microsystems. Proceedings of the IEEE, 97(3), 513-552.
  3. Ko, W. H., & Wang, Q. (1998). Touch mode capacitive pressure sensors. Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, 75(3), 242-251.
  4. Fraden, J. (2016). Handbook of Modern Sensors: Physics, Designs, and Applications. Springer.
  5. Puers, R. (2010). Linking capacitive sensors to the digital world. Procedia Engineering, 5, 68-75.
  6. Avnet Abacus. "Capacitive vs Piezoresistive vs Piezoelectric Pressure Sensors." URL: <https://my.avnet.com/abacus/solutions/technologies/sensors/pressure-sensors/core-technologies/capacitive-vs-piezoresistive-vs-piezoelectric/>
  7. PCB Piezotronics. "Introduction to Piezoelectric Pressure Sensors." URL: <https://www.pcb.com/resources/technical-information/introduction-to-pressure-sensors>
  8. Bai, W., et al. (2022). Submarine Optical Fiber Sensing System for the Real-Time Monitoring of Depth, Vibration, and Temperature. Frontiers in Marine Science, 9.
  9. Lee, H., et al. (2015). Development of a porous piezoresistive material and its applications to underwater pressure sensors and tactile sensors. 2015 IEEE SENSORS.
  10. ELEPCB. "The Ultimate Guide to Conformal Coating for Circuit Boards." URL: <https://www.elepcb.com/blog/choose-the-right-pcb-conformal-coating/>
  11. xidibei. "Is A Pressure Sensor Analog Or Digital?" URL: <https://www.xidibei.com/blogs/news/is-a-pressure-sensor-analog-or-digital>